![Porträtt av Xavier Groussot. Foto.](/sites/jur.lu.se/files/styles/lu_personal_page_desktop/public/2023-10/xavier_groussot_wcms.jpg.webp?itok=4V21P2cM)
Xavier Groussot
Professor
![Porträtt av Xavier Groussot. Foto.](/sites/jur.lu.se/files/styles/lu_personal_page_desktop/public/2023-10/xavier_groussot_wcms.jpg.webp?itok=4V21P2cM)
New Directions in Judicial Review? Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Impact Assessment in the Tobacco Product Directive Case
Författare
Redaktör
- Mats Tjernberg
- Pernilla Rendahl
- Henrik Wenander
Summary, in English
In this essay in honour of Christina Moëll, we focus on one particular recent case: the Philip Morris case delivered in May 2016 where the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rules on the validity of the Tobacco Product Directive case.1 It is a key case on the application of the principle of proportionality but not only since it connects this principle with other constitutional principles putting limits to the regulatory action such as fundamental rights and the principle of subsidiarity. This case constitutes a
perfect illustration of ‘administrative constitutionalism’, a doctrine which encapsulates the academic work of Christina Moëll in a nutshell.
perfect illustration of ‘administrative constitutionalism’, a doctrine which encapsulates the academic work of Christina Moëll in a nutshell.
Avdelning/ar
- EU-rätt
- Juridiska institutionen
Publiceringsår
2017
Språk
Engelska
Sidor
83-101
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie
Festskrift till Christina Moell
Dokumenttyp
Del av eller Kapitel i bok
Förlag
Juristförlaget i Lund
Ämne
- Law
Nyckelord
- Proportionality principle
- Subsidiarity
- Impact assessment
- EU law
- Proportionalitetsprincipen
- EU-rätt
Aktiv
Published
Forskningsgrupp
- EU Law
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISBN: 9789154405725