![Porträtt av Ulf Linderfalk. Foto.](/sites/jur.lu.se/files/styles/lu_personal_page_desktop/public/2023-06/Ulf_Linderfalk_WCMS_m.jpg.webp?itok=NLSX40vw)
Ulf Linderfalk
Professor
![Porträtt av Ulf Linderfalk. Foto.](/sites/jur.lu.se/files/styles/lu_personal_page_desktop/public/2023-06/Ulf_Linderfalk_WCMS_m.jpg.webp?itok=NLSX40vw)
The exercise of discretion in international law – why constraining criteria have a proper place in the analysis of legal decision-making
Författare
Summary, in English
In international law, the exercise of legal discretion is constrained by criteria, such as the abuse of rights doctrine and the principle of legal certainty. The hitherto research of these criteria gives reason to take up a discussion on the appropriate way of conceptualising discretion and constraining criteria. This article, in contrast to the belief of other scholars, makes a case for the understanding of the exercise of discretion as an activity separate from legal interpretation. As it insists, the application of a constraining criterion is wholly distinct from the form of arguments that can be derived from rules of interpretation.
Avdelning/ar
- Folkrätt
- Juridiska institutionen
Publiceringsår
2021
Språk
Engelska
Sidor
407-430
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie
German Yearbook of International Law
Volym
62
Issue
1
Dokumenttyp
Artikel i tidskrift
Förlag
Institut für Internationales Recht an der Universität Kiel
Ämne
- Law (excluding Law and Society)
Nyckelord
- Constraining Criteria
- Discretion
- Exercise of Discretion
- Interpretation
- Rules of Interpretation
Aktiv
Published
Forskningsgrupp
- Public International Law
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISSN: 0344-3094