Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Porträtt av Karol Nowak. Foto.

Karol Nowak

Universitetslektor

Porträtt av Karol Nowak. Foto.

National criminal procedure shoehorned into a global procedure shoe when trying crimes against humanity

Författare

  • Karol Nowak

Summary, in English

In this article the argument is made that a global court like the icc is not suitable for gaining the trust of those it rules over and that the procedure used when trying crimes against humanity is a poor fit as it is to a large extent based on national procedural codes. It is suggested that a split of the icc into several regional bodies with common procedural rules that are amended to suit the special needs when trying crimes against humanity would be beneficial for the court's credibility. The point is also made that the goals of international trials and tribunals a poorly formulated and that they over promise and need to be amended to better reflect reality.

Avdelning/ar

  • Folkrätt
  • Mänskliga rättigheter
  • Juridiska institutionen

Publiceringsår

2021

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

41-56

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

International Criminal Law Review

Volym

23

Issue

1

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

Brill

Ämne

  • Law

Nyckelord

  • Crimes against humanity
  • Human rights
  • International tribunals
  • Procedural law

Aktiv

Published

Forskningsgrupp

  • Public International Law
  • Human Rights Law

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 1567-536X